York

Should we demolish our Brutalist buildings?

, , ,
May 14th, 2012
GD Star Rating
loading...

An e-petition on the City of York Council website is proposing that the development at Stonebow should be knocked-down in a bid to improve the architectural ambience of the city.

The petition states that “The centre of this beautiful, historic city is blighted by the hideous Stonebow House, a tall, unsightly 1960s office block near the historic Shambles (voted Most Picturesque Street in Britain in 2010).”

It goes on to quote David Lloyd, from the Esher Report, “Stonebow House is “a piece of architecture crudely designed in the ‘New Brutalism’ style of the late 1950s”.”

Currently home to two of York’s best known venues, Fibbers and The Duchess, the development does appear sad and unkempt and is topped with an office block that towers above the adjacent buildings, such as the beautiful Grade II listed Central Methodist Chapel, built in 1840 that is currently hidden behind the ’60s block.

The building is one of York’s most well known eye-sores, right up there with the Park Inn and the now demolished public toilets on Parliament Street, known affectionately (or not) as ‘the splash palace‘.

So what do you think of Stonebow? Beauty is after all in the eye of the beholder, and for some the concrete austerity and imposing grayness may inspire love in those with a fondness for Eastern Bloc brutalism, who find the fussy chocolate box timber overhangs of the Shambles just a little too much. Like preferring the modern minimalism of Kraftwerk, or the coldness of Joy Division to the folky whisperings of Nick Drake, or the pitch-perfect over the top stylings of Jeff Buckley, aesthetics are subjective, a matter of personal taste.

Let us know your thoughts on Stonebow, and tell us what other eyesores, if the decision were yours, would you like to see removed or rehabilitated.

The ePetition runs until 29 May and can be found here.

  • JoelSmith

    I say we have it destroyed by using the guy who designed it as a demolition ball.

  • http://www.twitter.com/craigstephenson craigstephenson

    I walk past that building everyday (also Park Inn) and both are architectural blotts on an otherwise awe inspiring city, I personally wouldn`t be sorry to see these buildings go. So I approve of the Stonebow e-petition, although trust suitable provisions would be made for the many small businesses attached to this building, you mention the Duchess which gives many new artists a platform to perform, but also there are other smaller busineses that form part of the building.

  • Clarey

    Yes, Stonebow house is ugly – but does that mean it should be pulled down?  It’s part of our architectural history and if we say pull down all the buildings of this era and style we’re in danger of destroying our past just because it doesn’t conform to a pretty “chocolate box” style type of building.
     
    I always quite admire any one who had the guts to put a building up like that in York.  It’s shows far more bold and forward thinking than most of the boring generic modern building most developers seem to build these days.  You know the type, red brick with limestone window frames that have been made to look mock Victorian because someone thinks they aren’t very offensive with the rest of York’s buildings  In fact Splash Palace was a good example of that style of architecture.
     
    I’m not advocating that we should start to build more buildings in the Brutalism style – far from it, that movement is over and done with.  But we should at least try to save some of the buildings in this style from being demolished.  I also think modern architects could learn a lot from the boldness of the past and start creating buildings that challenge people and set a style for our era.

    • http://www.twitter.com/craigstephenson craigstephenson

       @Clarey A really well made point,  certainly got me thinking. I`m still not a fan of Stonebow, Park Inn or much of the office blocks on Piccadilly but you raise extremely good points :)

  • inkchamberlain

    get rid of them…

  • JadeBlood

    awww i like it :(

  • alicet

    It’s refreshing against the almost open-air themepark-iness of Olde Yorke. It being near the Shambles only makes that street more picturesque. If all the streets in York were like that, they wouldn’t be as special.

  • monkeycoat

    Why not leave the structure but renovate it for a different use, or make a feature out of it. No need to blindly adopt the ‘it’s ugly, tear it down’ approach. It still functions as a building, it’s a shame that it doesn’t fit into our culture of being so quick to dispose of things we don’t agree with. 
     
    Daniel Gray has made a point over on Flickr here;
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dannygray/galleries/72157622669843929/
     
    It shouldn’t be as simple as ‘tear it down and start again’ – we should work with what we’ve already got and see it as an exciting challenge that still preserves our architectural history, however ugly we think it is.
     
    Get some good architects in there to turn it into a welcoming and curious architectural space. YEAH!

© 2013 One&Other | Creative by The Beautiful Meme | Developed by Rural