York

Strange Bedfellows

, ,
July 23rd, 2012
GD Star Rating
a WordPress rating system

There has been a long tradition in the link between criticism and creativity. Thomas Sternes Eliot, widely regarded as (“do I dare?”) the greatest poet of the twentieth century, was also an eminent scholar in his own time, providing a contribution to the influential and controversial field of New Criticism. Besides Eliot, other men of letters have bridged the gap between commentary and authorship. Great writers such as Larkin, Auden, Johnson, and Coleridge were deftly intertwining both aspects of their work; their analytical criticism first, which they used to inform their poetic compositions. This austere age of enormous cuts to academic culture has limited such a chameleonic approach to literature. A group of intellectuals and writers from York and Hull have established a new project called “Strange Bedfellows”  in an attempt to remedy this problem. They intent to explore the growing difficulty academics face in continuing to both produce and analyse creative work as under Coalition Britain.

Sophie Coulombeau, Ben Madden and Ryan Hanley are the founders of this new project, and are calling for ten new contributors to the Strange Bedfellows’ blog. Coulombeau, author of “Rites”, which has gained praise from established writers such as Philip Pullman and Fiona Shaw, says that she aims to “help creative and academic communities to work together more effectively to articulate their importance and impact in age of government austerity.” Madden and Hanley are rising academics at York and Hull Universities, currently completing their PhDs. Together, these three have secured funding to interrogate the relationship between literary analysis and creativity. The real relevance of this research is not in the ivory-tower-style musing on this historic connection, but in how it can survive and improve in the face of financial adversity.

Regarding the project’s name, although tongue is held firmly in cheek, the teeth remain bitterly clenched. One can not help thinking that the “Strange Bedfellows” refers less to those abstract lovers, critic and writer, and rather more to Clegg’s and Cameron’s unlikely liaison dangereaux formed at the last general election. This project has fire in its belly, aiming to reach out beyond York University’s concrete walls and engage the community in its pursuit to put forward the case for not only the benefits of a thinker to both study and design, but the need for this creative fusion in modern Britain. Statistics show that more people are reading in Britain than ever before, and more people outside of Britain our reading our books. Literature as a major cultural export and tourist attraction demonstrates a demand for improved critical and creative practice.

Alongside a series of lectures, seminars and conferences, Coulombeau, Madden and Hanley are looking for ten contributors for the Strange Bedfellows’ blog. They are asking for literature students, academics, critics as well as filmmakers, poets or musicians with an interest in theory or philosophy. The bloggers would contribute stories and editorials from September 2012 to August 2013 every other week, although the deadlines are flexible. The ten bloggers in writing to understand the creative/analytical relationship will sharpen their own skills as well as developing a better insight into their own art and what informs it.

I doubt that there will ever be again men and women “of letters” like Eliot and Samuel Johnson in times gone by. But in this technological age it is important for authors to also have a critical output. It sharpens their own instincts when they face the blank page and the blinking cursor. The scholar likewise may nurture his tools of analysis after understanding the rigour it takes in the composition of new work. Strange Bedfellows’ goal of reconciling and understanding the man of letters, the Renaissance man, whatever one wants to call it, is ambitious. Perhaps this project is the end of the rigid framework which differentiates critic from poet or novelist, and critical efforts will go into exploring the total output of individual authorship.

For more information on this exciting new, writer-led, initiative visit www.strange-bedfellows.org. If you are interested in joining the team of bloggers for the next year, or require more information about the project email strangebedfellowsproject@gmail.com or tweet @StrangeBedProj.

 

  • FranM

    This is an interesting idea & one well worth keeping an eye on so thanks for highlighting. I do find the following sentence in the article odd, “I doubt that there will ever be again men and women “of letters” like Eliot and Samuel Johnson in times gone by.” Why do you doubt it? It’s a very conservative and backward looking comment, and it would be interesting to know why you made it. Of course we don’t know what will happen in the future, but if the many, many, fine and distinguished ‘men of letters’ (and women of course) that have continued these great literary traditions since Eliot and Johnson right up to the present day, are anything to go by then I would say that the future will be just as bright for literature and ‘letters’ as the past.
     
    Just a small point in an otherwise great article, it’s just that lack of belief that anyone in the future could achieve what you perceive as greatness in the world of letters that rankles. 

  • adamalcock

    Thanks for the feedback. In response to the criticism of pessimism, I feel I may have misrepresented myself – or perhaps we have a different semantic conception of the “man of letters.” The “man of letters” as it always has been I feel is almost extinct. Samuel Johnson, William Hazlitt, Leavis and latterly Orwell and possibly Christopher Hitchens and all were masters of the dialectical essay. However, I’m not sure that in the current state of journalism, in a world of mass media a “man of letters” in the traditional sense can exist. The essay is dead, instead the editorial – the seven hundred word article has replaced the ten thousand word diatribe or exploration of a theme or a topic. How can the high speed information world we live in allow for the long essay? The medium, as we all know, is the massage as Marshall McLuan would have it. The internet, Facebook, twitter and blogging have killed the essay, ergo also the writer of such essays – the Man of Letters, if you will. There are great writers, journalists, polymaths currently alive but I would hesitate to bestow upon them this glorious title.

    • FranM

       @adamalcock Thanks for the reply and I see your point and I did enjoy the article. I do however feel that you overestimate the importance of social media and blogging on intellectual thought. The world of 140 characters, status updates and blogs is, for the moment, here to stay, and has wonderful applications as a new medium for expression, but I would be cautious in claiming that it will kill off serious thought and the exploration of ideas in essay form. After all one medium has been around for hundreds of years, the other for less than a decade, it is perhaps too soon to judge. 
       
      Social media and ‘new journalism’ may distract the attention of those whose attention spans have been brutally cut short by the information overload of the web but serious discourse does and, I believe will, continue to exist. Just looking at your examples of past great men of letters it is hard to imagine Orwell or Leavis being too much curtailed in their intellectual pursuits by our ‘high speed information world’ although I can imagine Johnson getting a little distracted by Twitter, and when great minds write there will always be an audience for their ideas. Hitchens’ excellent collection of essays, ‘Arguably’, published in October 2011 shortly before his death, was both critically well received and, more importantly, available in high street bookshops across the land as there was presumably a consumer demand for the work, somewhat giving the lie to the idea that the essay is dead (as also perhaps does your point that more people are reading in Britain than ever before). 
       
      As advances in communication and connectivity rapidly change the world we live in, perhaps with profound results that we cannot yet know, coupled with the extensive threats to our existence posed by climate change, there may well be more need for serious and lengthy intellectual discourse rather than less. Indeed, the essay would not be speaking out of turn if it quoted another fine man of letters, Mark Twain… “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.”
       
       
       
       

      • adamalcock

         @FranM Thanks for the response, clearly there is a difference of opinion on what constitutes a “man of letters”. It is incontrovertible that essays have become editorials, and articles have become much shorter in the broadsheet newspapers. The Tatler and other journals which dominated the 18th century are no longer there for writers to publish essays in. Hitchens may have been the last of his kind, a special case for Vanity Fair. There are no newspapers in this country which have their own literary editor any more, aside from the Times Literary Supplement. James Woods speaks at length on the subject (search on YouTube). My email is adam.alcock@gmail.com if you want to discuss this further. 

© 2013 One&Other | Creative by The Beautiful Meme | Developed by Rural