York

TED A DAY: Dangerous memes

,
January 15th, 2012
GD Star Rating
loading...

Dangerous memes spread like toxic ideas

Today’s TED A Day comes from the wonderful philosopher and scientist Dan Dennett and tackles the fascinating concept of memes. Dennett is one of the greatest thinkers on the complex subjects of human consciousness and free will, and this TED lecture delves into the dark side of memes.

The word ‘meme’ comes from Richard Dawkins’ 1976 book The Selfish Gene, and it is an Darwinian concept concerning the spreading of ideas and behaviours from human to human. Just as genes spread from parent to child, Dawkins put forward the theory that ideas could spread from person to person, culture to culture.

Just as some genetic evolutionary traits are lost in the Darwinian struggle, so are some ideas, while others thrive and spread across populations where they continue to evolve and change. The very idea of memes is itself a meme that is right at this second being passed from me to you, where if this article means anything to you, you may choose to pass the meme on further, thus continuing the spread of this idea.

Dennett puts forward the case for dangerous memes in this insightful talk. Starting with a tale of an ant with a parasite within its brain, Dennett goes on to question why we consider the spider’s web as a result of natural evolution but not the world wide web. It’s an interesting point, and as soon as you start to think of all the technology and the culture we create as part of the natural continuation of human evolution, the idea of memes becomes clearer. The spider creates its web, we create ours, what’s the difference?

Moving on to dangerous memes, Dennett examines the ideas that people will die for. Unlike any other species we have ideas and concepts that can override our genetic interests and cause us to die for ideologies, religion and politics. As memes these dangerous ideas spread from brain to brain and continually replicate, they are toxic information packets that once are out there, spread through the population like a virus.

Many of the memes that are created in the western world will not have a negative effect upon us as we are so used to them. Just as explorers to the New World spread viruses that were harmless to them but devastating to those they came across, so some of the memes we are spreading via television, the internet, and the media could be potentially damaging to other cultures. Most of us are able to shrug off pornography and violence as we are so used to them playing a role in our culture, but the danger, Dennett argues, is when these memes clash with cultures that are not so immune they can be dangerous.

The real danger comes when they clash with memes native to the culture they are infiltrating, and specifically with the ideas that they are prepared to die for. This is seen most clearly with the response of proponents of some forms of radical Islam. But how do we tell the good memes from the bad, and how can we stop potential violence that can arise from these clashes?

Dennett believes that we need to use science and reason to work out the implications of memes that we may be inadvertently spreading through the world’s populations. By using facts to work out the implications of our ability to spread ideas via our technology like never before, we can calmly look at any potential damage we may do. Resorting to anger and violence will never solve these cultural differences, but reason may.

All of this isn’t to say that there aren’t good memes, as we know very well at One&Other… there are actually some beautiful memes out there as well.

 

Array
  • simonlong1

    Thanks Kate. The food industry is a very political place with industrial scale companies like Coke and Pepsi having some serious power. It’ll be interesting to see how far the tax man gets in taking them on.

  • coffeewithkate

    I’ve happily signed the petition. I myself have been categorised homeless twice and I also have had first hand experience of these ‘dubious’ private rented properties as mentioned by @JonnyMotto This is an appalling state of affairs and I hope public pressure can win the day.

  • Tall Paul

    I thought all the Renaissance artists had teams of people helping them, and were closer to Warhol’s factory than the cult of the artist would have us think

  • 161

    Well, yes! Except in their inimitable style the University has placed this admittedly wonderful facility, in the middle of nowhere in the 2010s equivalent of 1960s ‘I hate people’ architecture. More importantly these two theatres are as far away from potential audiences as the University can put them. Getting there, especially for disabled people, is a nightmare, and even fit healy folks are going to think four or five times whether it is worth the bother of trekking all the way out there. It is classic example of botched institutional planning. AND students are expected to live out there: poor things!

  • 161

    Busses are but a small part of the issue – and they are particularly absent at night time and disabled folk still have to cross the tundra to get to the theatres. Put lead weights on your ankles or a stone in your shoe and then try and survive on campus. No this is not a town and gown whinge: I have been suffering getting on and off campus now for 6 years. Until recently the 4 was the only option but the new campus has stimulated a couple of service changes eg. 6, and the periodicity of the 55 still sucks.

    The University and Council have tons of cooperative rhetoric but very little follow through and ever since the founding of the University the unofficial policy for the two to have as little to do with one another as possible. And it doesn’t abrogate the fact that the architecture is dire; the environment sterile; and the place is not ATTRACTIVE for visitors. I have had a lot of discussions with the University about this: the long term plans were predicated on the likelyhood of the farmland around the university being turned into a housing estate. As no such published plans apper to exist I am pretty sure it is hot air – none the less, it is a frightening prospect.

  • inkchamberlain

    yeah, definitely anything at the victoria and albert museum..

  • DaveTaylor

    THE CHEMICAL BROTHERS: DON’T THINK is showing at City Screen on Friday 3 February at 11pm, stu goulden http://www.picturehouses.co.uk/cinema/York_Picturehouse/News/Item/The_Chemical_Brothers_Dont_Think/

  • Tall Paul

    I haven’t had as much fun on Twitter since the Royal Wedding. same time next week guys?

  • LukeRodgers

    Thanks for the support guys :) Luke

  • hollyort

    poor rats.

  • kim_hopkins

    so they were rat-arsed rats?

© 2013 One&Other | Creative by The Beautiful Meme | Developed by Rural